All Insights
Statutory Reporting

Maximising Efficiency: A Holistic Approach to Statutory Reporting and Tax

12 February 2025 · 4 min read · By Osprey Consulting

Tax and statutory reporting are often treated as separate activities — separate workflows, separate systems, separate teams. But the numbers they rely on are the same. When figures change, as they regularly do, both teams have to restart their processes. It is a source of significant inefficiency that integrated technology can resolve.

The problem with siloed processes

When corporate tax and statutory reporting run on disconnected systems, the practical consequences are predictable:

  • A change to a tax position requires parallel updates in two places
  • Tax disclosures get manually copied from workings into statutory accounts
  • Each team maintains its own version of what should be a single source of truth
  • Audit queries require cross-referencing multiple documents and spreadsheets
  • The risk of inconsistency between the tax return and statutory accounts grows with each manual step

According to Deloitte’s 2023 Global Tax Transformation Survey, 67% of tax leaders are actively exploring integrated processes to streamline compliance. The direction of travel is clear — the question is how to get there.

Where the integration matters most

There are two critical points where statutory reporting and corporate tax genuinely intersect and where integration delivers the most immediate value.

Tax provision into statutory disclosures

The current and deferred tax disclosures in statutory accounts flow directly from the tax provision. If these are maintained in separate systems, any change to the provision requires a manual update to the accounts. Connecting them eliminates this re-keying step entirely — a change in one flows through automatically to the other.

Corporate tax returns and the trial balance

During compliance periods, corporate tax returns draw on the same trial balance data that underpins the statutory accounts. A shared, validated data source means both processes start from consistent numbers — reducing the risk of discrepancies emerging during review or audit, and eliminating the need to reconcile between two independently maintained datasets.

What integrated technology delivers

Platforms like ONESOURCE Statutory Reporting and ONESOURCE Corporate Tax are designed to work together. When implemented with integration in mind, the benefits are concrete:

  • Real-time trial balance updates — a change in the source data flows through automatically rather than requiring manual rework across multiple documents
  • Consistent disclosures — tax notes in statutory accounts draw from the same calculations as the tax return, eliminating the risk of the two diverging
  • Cleaner audit trail — a single, connected workflow creates a clear record of what changed and when, supporting both internal review and external audit
  • Multi-jurisdiction consistency — standardised templates and data mapping reduce the risk of errors as organisations operate across multiple GAAPs and regulatory environments

The role of automation

Integration between platforms removes the biggest single source of manual effort. Automation tools like Alteryx can then add a further layer of efficiency:

  • Automated trial balance loading — pulling data from the ERP, applying mapping and validation, and loading it directly into the tax or reporting platform
  • Automated disclosure generation — producing formatted disclosure language from structured data, reducing document preparation time significantly
  • Validation and exception reporting — flagging anomalies before they become audit findings, rather than discovering them mid-review

For organisations with multiple entities across multiple jurisdictions, the combination of connected platforms and automated data flows can reduce compliance and reporting hours significantly. This is not a theoretical benefit — it is a practical outcome we have seen in client engagements.

Getting started

The starting point is usually an honest assessment of where the most manual effort currently sits. For most organisations, it is either in data transfer between systems or in the maintenance of parallel workings across tax and statutory teams.

If you would like to discuss what a more integrated approach might look like for your organisation — and what it would realistically take to get there — get in touch with us.

MH
CH
Mark Hart & Charlotte Hart
Co-founders, Osprey Consulting · FCA · CTA

Over 40 years combined experience in tax, finance, and technology — delivered directly to every client.

Ready to discuss your requirements?

We are happy to have a straightforward conversation about your situation — no lengthy proposal, no hard sell.